home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ Hidden Truth / Hidden Truth.iso / data / newspostings / 1401-1500 / 1472 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1996-06-19  |  1.8 KB
  1. Path: news.demon.co.uk!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!usenet1.news.uk.psi.net!uknet!EU.net!sun4nl!sun4nl!surfnet.nl!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.coast.net!news2.acs.oakland.edu!cwis-20.wayne.edu!pookie.pass.wayne.edu!mje
  2. From: mje@pookie.pass.wayne.edu (Michael Edelman)
  3. Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.alien.research,alt.ufo.reports,alt.paranet.abduct,sci.skeptic,alt.paranet.science
  4. Subject: Re: Are all UFO debunkers rabid crackpots?
  5. Followup-To: alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.alien.research,alt.ufo.reports,alt.paranet.abduct,sci.skeptic,alt.paranet.science
  6. Date: 19 Jun 1996 13:06:31 GMT
  7. Organization: Wayne State University
  8. Lines: 15
  9. Message-ID: <4q8u0n$joo@cwis-20.wayne.edu>
  10. References: <31C5A845.1319@compuserve.com> <4q4dll$rlk@cwis-20.wayne.edu> <31C5DC53.14D0@students.wisc.edu> <4q527r$g3b@cwis-20.wayne.edu> <31C63394.7AB6@students.wisc.edu> <Dt89DA.EJA@eskimo.com> <31C79A13.3389@students.wisc.edu>
  11. NNTP-Posting-Host: pookie.pass.wayne.edu
  12. X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
  13. Xref: news.demon.co.uk alt.alien.visitors:88375 alt.paranet.ufo:53760 alt.alien.research:26160 alt.ufo.reports:9472 alt.paranet.abduct:5871 sci.skeptic:72634 alt.paranet.science:3201
  14.  
  15. Brian Zeiler (bdzeiler@students.wisc.edu) wrote:
  16.  
  17. : However, I'm not convinced that this syllogism is well-substantiated.  
  18. : How can you expect physical proof as a direct, established consequence of 
  19. : alien visitation?  Do you think aliens would say "Gee, those humans need 
  20. : physical proof.  Maybe we should drop a few of our lighters, cocktail 
  21. : napkins, dead colleagues, and saucer propulsion drives onto the White 
  22. : House Lawn so they have physical proof of our visits."  Get real.
  23.  
  24. So the famous Mg fragments *aren't* proof of alien visitation after all?
  25.  
  26. And nothing really crashed at Roswell?
  27.  
  28. Hmm.
  29.  
  30.